[GAME THEORY] Who can keep an incident open after the vulnerable server is patched?
Integrity Tech’s scanning-to-collection model puts the decision on attack-path ownership, not another attribution desk.
Integrity Tech’s scanning-to-collection model puts the decision on attack-path ownership, not another attribution desk.
Integrity Tech's capability mix changes the investment question: which routes to mail and identity remain after remediation?
The attacker needs sustained, useful output. Defenders can turn that dependency into friction across the access ecosystem.
Shared intrusion logistics can be a better chokepoint than one APT—if defenders can prove real control-plane dependence.
China-linked operators are turning compromised routers into relay logistics. The defender move is behavior over bad IPs.
A bad IP can be accurate and still tell the wrong story.
“We patched it” is doing a lot of emotional labor.
FIRESTARTER surviving the usual cleanup path is the edge-device version of finding out your deadbolt came with a forwarding address…